↓ Skip to main content

A comprehensive evaluation of rodent malaria parasite genomes and gene expression

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

1 patent
1 Wikipedia page


190 Dimensions

Readers on

228 Mendeley
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
A comprehensive evaluation of rodent malaria parasite genomes and gene expression
Published in
BMC Biology, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12915-014-0086-0
Pubmed ID

Thomas D Otto, Ulrike Böhme, Andrew P Jackson, Martin Hunt, Blandine Franke-Fayard, Wieteke A M Hoeijmakers, Agnieszka A Religa, Lauren Robertson, Mandy Sanders, Solabomi A Ogun, Deirdre Cunningham, Annette Erhart, Oliver Billker, Shahid M Khan, Hendrik G Stunnenberg, Jean Langhorne, Anthony A Holder, Andrew P Waters, Chris I Newbold, Arnab Pain, Matthew Berriman, Chris J Janse

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 222 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 26%
Student > Master 45 20%
Researcher 39 17%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 20 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 69 30%
Immunology and Microbiology 21 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 5%
Computer Science 9 4%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 22 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2020.
All research outputs
of 16,810,341 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biology
of 1,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 345,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biology
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,810,341 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them