You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence for the impacts of agroforestry on agricultural productivity, ecosystem services, and human well-being in high-income countries: a systematic map protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-018-0136-0 |
| Authors |
Sarah E. Brown, Daniel C. Miller, Pablo J. Ordonez, Kathy Baylis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Qatar | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 381 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 381 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 65 | 17% |
| Researcher | 45 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 38 | 10% |
| Unknown | 147 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 93 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 61 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 12 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 9% |
| Unknown | 162 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2018.
All research outputs
#4,243,164
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#155
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,306
of 367,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.