↓ Skip to main content

Widespread Horizontal Gene Transfer from Circular Single-stranded DNA Viruses to Eukaryotic Genomes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Widespread Horizontal Gene Transfer from Circular Single-stranded DNA Viruses to Eukaryotic Genomes
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-11-276
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huiquan Liu, Yanping Fu, Bo Li, Xiao Yu, Jiatao Xie, Jiasen Cheng, Said A Ghabrial, Guoqing Li, Xianhong Yi, Daohong Jiang

Abstract

In addition to vertical transmission, organisms can also acquire genes from other distantly related species or from their extra-chromosomal elements (plasmids and viruses) via horizontal gene transfer (HGT). It has been suggested that phages represent substantial forces in prokaryotic evolution. In eukaryotes, retroviruses, which can integrate into host genome as an obligate step in their replication strategy, comprise approximately 8% of the human genome. Unlike retroviruses, few members of other virus families are known to transfer genes to host genomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
United States 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 174 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 54 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 21%
Student > Master 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 6%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 20 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 102 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 29 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,659,519
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,185
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,946
of 142,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#15
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.