You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Can probiotics be an alternative to chlorhexidine for oral care in the mechanically ventilated patient? A multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled open trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-018-2209-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bengt Klarin, Anne Adolfsson, Anders Torstensson, Anders Larsson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 11% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 84% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 205 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 12% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Researcher | 10 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Unknown | 91 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 96 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,371,676
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,112
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,426
of 362,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#95
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.