You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Protocol for the IDEAL-2 longitudinal study: following the experiences of people with dementia and their primary carers to understand what contributes to living well with dementia and enhances active life
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-018-6129-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barbora Silarova, Sharon M. Nelis, Rosalie M. Ashworth, Clive Ballard, Marta Bieńkiewicz, Catherine Henderson, Alexandra Hillman, John V. Hindle, Julian C. Hughes, Ruth A. Lamont, Rachael Litherland, Ian R. Jones, Roy W. Jones, Martin Knapp, Piers Kotting, Anthony Martyr, Fiona E. Matthews, Robin G. Morris, Catherine Quinn, Jemma Regan, Jennifer M. Rusted, Eleanor Ann van den Heuvel, Christina R. Victor, Yu-Tzu Wu, Linda Clare |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 63% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 43 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 10% |
| Psychology | 11 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 45 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,243,779
of 23,109,468 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,540
of 15,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,167
of 351,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#55
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,109,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,070 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.