↓ Skip to main content

Thrombocytosis and hyperfibrinogenemia are predictive factors of clinical outcomes in high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Thrombocytosis and hyperfibrinogenemia are predictive factors of clinical outcomes in high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients
Published in
BMC Cancer, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12885-016-2070-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zheng Feng, Hao Wen, Rui Bi, Yachen Duan, Wentao Yang, Xiaohua Wu

Abstract

Over 20 % of ovarian cancer patients have preoperative thrombocytosis or hyperfibrinogenemia. We aimed to demonstrate the clinical and prognostic significance of thrombocytosis and hyperfibrinogenemia in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC). We retrospectively investigated HGSC patients who underwent primary staging or debulking surgery between April 2005 and June 2013 in our institution. None of these patients had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Data, including age, performance status, FIGO stage, serum CA125, platelet count, fibrinogen level, and surgical residual disease, were collected. Thrombocytosis was defined as a platelet count greater than 450 × 10(9)/L, and hyperfibrinogenemia was defined as a fibrinogen level higher than 4.00 g/L. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests for univariate analyses. For the multivariate analyses, Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the effects of the prognostic factors, which are expressed as hazard ratios (HRs). A total of 875 consecutive HGSC patients were identified. The median follow-up time was 29 (1-115) months. The median (interquartile range, IQR) preoperative platelet count was 301 (235-383) × 10(9)/L, and 121 (13.8 %) women had thrombocytosis. The median (IQR) preoperative fibrinogen level was 3.85 (3.19-4.45) g/L, and 332 (45.9 %) of the patients had hyperfibrinogenemia. Both preoperative thrombocytosis and hyperfibrinogenemia were associated with an advanced FIGO stage (p = 0.008 and <0.001, respectively), an increased CA125 level (p = 0.004 and 0.001, respectively), more extensive ascites (p < 0.001 and <0.001, respectively), more extensive residual disease (p < 0.001 and <0.001, respectively) and chemosensitivity (p = 0.043 and <0.001, respectively). In the univariate analyses, hyperfibrinogenemia was associated with reduced PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001). However, thrombocytosis was not found to be a potential predictor of PFS (P = 0.098) or OS (p = 0.894). In the multivariate analyses, hyperfibrinogenemia was an independent predictor of OS (p = 0.014) but not PFS (p = 0.062). Preoperative thrombocytosis and hyperfibrinogenemia reflected tumor burden to some extent and thus influenced treatment outcomes, and the fibrinogen level was found to be useful as a prognostic predictor in the HGSC patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 26%
Student > Bachelor 4 21%
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2016.
All research outputs
#18,805,293
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#5,517
of 8,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289,674
of 399,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#127
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,440 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.