↓ Skip to main content

AL and ATTR cardiac amyloid are different: native T1 mapping and ECV detect different biology

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Taylor & Francis Ltd), January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
AL and ATTR cardiac amyloid are different: native T1 mapping and ECV detect different biology
Published in
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Taylor & Francis Ltd), January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-16-s1-p341
Authors

Marianna Fontana, Sanjay M Banypersad, Thomas A Treibel, Viviana Maestrini, Daniel Sado, Steven K White, Heerajnarain Bulluck, Anna S Herrey, Philip N Hawkins, James Moon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 22%
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 17%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 72%
Chemistry 1 6%
Unknown 4 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2020.
All research outputs
#16,684,450
of 18,863,398 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Taylor & Francis Ltd)
#1,040
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289,368
of 333,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Taylor & Francis Ltd)
#88
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,863,398 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.