You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementing PRISMA-P: recommendations for prospective authors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-016-0191-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Moher, Lesley Stewart, Paul Shekelle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 24% |
| United States | 4 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| South Africa | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 52% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 19% |
| Scientists | 8 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 141 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Researcher | 13 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 24% |
| Unknown | 33 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 8% |
| Psychology | 12 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 29% |
| Unknown | 39 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,547,376
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#230
of 2,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,998
of 405,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#6
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.