↓ Skip to main content

Determinants of participation in voluntary work: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determinants of participation in voluntary work: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12889-018-6077-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacobien Niebuur, Lidy van Lente, Aart C. Liefbroer, Nardi Steverink, Nynke Smidt

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Master 8 13%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 19%
Social Sciences 8 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 14 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2018.
All research outputs
#646,949
of 13,918,259 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#666
of 9,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,408
of 315,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#107
of 1,139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,918,259 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.