Title |
Efficacy and tolerability of an undenatured type II collagen supplement in modulating knee osteoarthritis symptoms: a multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12937-016-0130-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
James P. Lugo, Zainulabedin M. Saiyed, Nancy E. Lane |
Abstract |
Undenatured type II collagen (UC-II) is a nutritional supplement derived from chicken sternum cartilage. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of UC-II for knee osteoarthritis (OA) pain and associated symptoms compared to placebo and to glucosamine hydrochloride plus chondroitin sulfate (GC). One hundred ninety one volunteers were randomized into three groups receiving a daily dose of UC-II (40 mg), GC (1500 mg G & 1200 mg C), or placebo for a 180-day period. The primary endpoint was the change in total Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) from baseline through day 180 for the UC-II group versus placebo and GC. Secondary endpoints included the Lequesne Functional Index (LFI), the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and the WOMAC subscales. Modified intent-to-treat analysis were performed for all endpoints using analysis of covariance and mixed model repeated measures, while incremental area under the curve was calculated by the intent-to-treat method. At day 180, the UC-II group demonstrated a significant reduction in overall WOMAC score compared to placebo (p = 0.002) and GC (p = 0.04). Supplementation with UC-II also resulted in significant changes for all three WOMAC subscales: pain (p = 0.0003 vs. placebo; p = 0.016 vs. GC); stiffness (p = 0.004 vs. placebo; p = 0.044 vs. GC); physical function (p = 0.007 vs. placebo). Safety outcomes did not differ among the groups. UC-II improved knee joint symptoms in knee OA subjects and was well-tolerated. Additional studies that elucidate the mechanism for this supplement's actions are warranted. CTRI/2013/05/003663 ; CTRI/2013/02/003348 . |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Turkey | 22 | 17% |
United States | 11 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Peru | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 92 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 117 | 89% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Scientists | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 3 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 325 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 60 | 18% |
Student > Master | 48 | 15% |
Researcher | 42 | 13% |
Other | 30 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 5% |
Other | 55 | 17% |
Unknown | 77 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 89 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 4% |
Other | 54 | 16% |
Unknown | 89 | 27% |