↓ Skip to main content

In vivo kinematics of a unique posterior-stabilized knee implant during a stepping exercise

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In vivo kinematics of a unique posterior-stabilized knee implant during a stepping exercise
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13018-016-0354-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takatomo Mine, Kenji Hoshi, Kazuyoshi Gamada, Koichiro Ihara, Hiroyuki Kawamura, Ryutaro Kuriyama, Ryo Date

Abstract

Stair-stepping motion is important in daily living, similar to gait. Knee prostheses need to have even more superior performance and stability in stair-stepping motion than in gait. The purpose of this analysis was to estimate in vivo knee motion in stair stepping and determine if this unique knee prosthesis function as designed. A total of 20 patients with Bi-Surface posterior-stabilizing (PS) implants were assessed. The Bi-Surface PS knee is a posterior-cruciate substitute prosthesis with a unique ball-and-socket joint in the mid-posterior portion of the femoral and tibial components. Patients were examined during stair-stepping motion using a 2-dimensional to 3-dimensional registration technique. The kinematic pattern in step up was a medial pivot, in which the level of anteroposterior translation was very small. In step down, the kinematic pattern was neither a pivot shift nor a rollback. From minimum to maximum flexion, anterior femoral translation occurred slightly. In this study, this unique implant had good joint stability during stair stepping. The joint's stability during stair stepping was affected by the design of the femorotibial joint rather than post/cam engagement or the ball-and-socket joint.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Libya 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 18%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 16 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Engineering 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 18 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2016.
All research outputs
#15,355,821
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#647
of 1,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,852
of 397,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#19
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,372 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.