You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bridging the gap between pragmatic intervention design and theory: using behavioural science tools to modify an existing quality improvement programme to implement “Sepsis Six”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-016-0376-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Siri H. Steinmo, Susan Michie, Christopher Fuller, Sarah Stanley, Caitriona Stapleton, Sheldon P. Stone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 23 | 51% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 27% |
| Scientists | 8 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 311 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 57 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 44 | 14% |
| Unknown | 74 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 52 | 17% |
| Psychology | 51 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 46 | 15% |
| Unknown | 85 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,176,814
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#189
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,812
of 411,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#6
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.