You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Games with a scientific purpose
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Biology, December 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/gb-2011-12-12-135 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Benjamin M Good, Andrew I Su |
Abstract |
The protein folding game Foldit shows that games are an effective way to recruit, engage and organize ordinary citizens to help solve difficult scientific problems. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 21% |
United States | 3 | 11% |
Spain | 3 | 11% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 4% |
Mexico | 1 | 4% |
Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 57% |
Scientists | 9 | 32% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
Brazil | 2 | 2% |
Germany | 2 | 2% |
Finland | 2 | 2% |
Kenya | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Hungary | 1 | <1% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 87 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 20% |
Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
Other | 18 | 17% |
Unknown | 6 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 26% |
Computer Science | 24 | 22% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
Other | 25 | 23% |
Unknown | 7 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2020.
All research outputs
#649,389
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#404
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,465
of 249,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#2
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.