You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Microbiota dysbiosis and barrier dysfunction in inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancers: exploring a common ground hypothesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Science, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12929-018-0483-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linda Chia-Hui Yu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Singapore | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 322 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 13% |
| Researcher | 36 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 51 | 16% |
| Unknown | 90 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 50 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 28 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 44 | 14% |
| Unknown | 114 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,489,847
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#90
of 1,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,571
of 366,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.