↓ Skip to main content

Antioxidant activity of linalool in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antioxidant activity of linalool in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome
Published in
BMC Neurology, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12883-016-0541-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geun-Hye Seol, Purum Kang, Hui Su Lee, Geun Hee Seol

Abstract

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common peripheral neuropathy and ischemic-reperfusion injury. Oxidative stress is considered a major cause of CTS. Linalool, a component of essential oils, has antioxidant activity. This study was designed to determine the effects of linalool inhalation on oxidative stress in patients with CTS. This double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessed the effects of linalool inhalation on oxidative stress in patients with CTS. Thirty-seven subjects, with and without CTS, were randomized to inhalation of 1 % linalool or carrier oil. 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity, systolic blood pressure (sBP), diastolic blood pressure (dBP) and pulse rate were analyzed. DPPH inhibition was significantly higher in both experimental groups than in their respective controls. Moreover inhalation of linalool reduced sBP, dBP and pulse rate in the CTS group, and pulse rate in the non-CTS group. However, there were no significant differences among the study groups in nitrite levels, sBP, dBP and pulse rate. Inhalation of linalool increases antioxidative activity and reduces blood pressure and pulse rate in patients with CTS.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 121 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Master 11 9%
Other 9 7%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 30 25%
Unknown 41 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 8%
Chemistry 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 48 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,708,941
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#599
of 2,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,523
of 397,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#10
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.