↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of implementation strategies to influence adherence to the clinical pathway for screening, assessment and management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients (ADAPT CP): study…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of implementation strategies to influence adherence to the clinical pathway for screening, assessment and management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients (ADAPT CP): study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Cancer, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12885-018-4962-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Phyllis Butow, Joanne Shaw, Heather L. Shepherd, Melanie Price, Lindy Masya, Brian Kelly, Nicole M. Rankin, Afaf Girgis, Thomas F. Hack, Philip Beale, Rosalie Viney, Haryana M. Dhillon, Joseph Coll, Patrick Kelly, Melanie Lovell, Peter Grimison, Tim Shaw, Tim Luckett, Jessica Cuddy, Fiona White

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 161 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 14%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 56 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 27 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 14%
Psychology 21 13%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Unspecified 4 2%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 62 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,817,811
of 24,378,020 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#553
of 8,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,801
of 357,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#14
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,378,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,657 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.