↓ Skip to main content

Dog survey in Russian veterinary hospitals: tick identification and molecular detection of tick-borne pathogens

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dog survey in Russian veterinary hospitals: tick identification and molecular detection of tick-borne pathogens
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13071-018-3161-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalia N. Livanova, Natalia V. Fomenko, Ivan A. Akimov, Mikhail J. Ivanov, Nina V. Tikunova, Rob Armstrong, Sergey V. Konyaev

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 15 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 14 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,820,183
of 19,872,770 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#1,283
of 4,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,789
of 330,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#171
of 603 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,872,770 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 603 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.