You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cardiovascular disease risk and comparison of different strategies for blood pressure management in rural India
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-018-6142-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Devarsetty Praveen, David Peiris, Stephen MacMahon, Kishor Mogulluru, Arvind Raghu, Anthony Rodgers, Shailaja Chilappagari, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Gari D. Clifford, Pallab K. Maulik, Emily Atkins, Rohina Joshi, Stephane Heritier, Stephen Jan, Anushka Patel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 6 | 33% |
Australia | 2 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
China | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 44% |
Scientists | 6 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
Researcher | 7 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Unknown | 17 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 12% |
Sports and Recreations | 4 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Unknown | 22 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,870,910
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,068
of 15,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,090
of 345,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#43
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.