↓ Skip to main content

Methodological development of tools to measure how women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: labor observation and community survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
47 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
316 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methodological development of tools to measure how women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: labor observation and community survey
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12874-018-0603-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meghan A. Bohren, Joshua P. Vogel, Bukola Fawole, Ernest T. Maya, Thae Maung Maung, Mamadou Diouldé Baldé, Agnes A. Oyeniran, Modupe Ogunlade, Kwame Adu-Bonsaffoh, Nwe Oo Mon, Boubacar Alpha Diallo, Abou Bangoura, Richard Adanu, Sihem Landoulsi, A. Metin Gülmezoglu, Özge Tunçalp

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 316 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 16%
Researcher 32 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 6%
Lecturer 14 4%
Other 58 18%
Unknown 114 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 65 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 49 16%
Social Sciences 23 7%
Unspecified 10 3%
Psychology 9 3%
Other 35 11%
Unknown 125 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,144,700
of 25,364,653 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#117
of 2,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,812
of 350,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#6
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.