You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The homeodomain complement of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi suggests that Ctenophora and Porifera diverged prior to the ParaHoxozoa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EvoDevo, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2041-9139-1-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph F Ryan, Kevin Pang, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, James C Mullikin, Mark Q Martindale, Andreas D Baxevanis |
| Abstract |
The much-debated phylogenetic relationships of the five early branching metazoan lineages (Bilateria, Cnidaria, Ctenophora, Placozoa and Porifera) are of fundamental importance in piecing together events that occurred early in animal evolution. Comparisons of gene content between organismal lineages have been identified as a potentially useful methodology for phylogenetic reconstruction. However, these comparisons require complete genomes that, until now, did not exist for the ctenophore lineage. The homeobox superfamily of genes is particularly suited for these kinds of gene content comparisons, since it is large, diverse, and features a highly conserved domain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 3% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Norway | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 161 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 25% |
| Researcher | 38 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Professor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 104 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2024.
All research outputs
#875,334
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from EvoDevo
#14
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,537
of 100,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EvoDevo
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them