↓ Skip to main content

In vivo assessment of neuroinflammation in progressive multiple sclerosis: a proof of concept study with [18F]DPA714 PET

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In vivo assessment of neuroinflammation in progressive multiple sclerosis: a proof of concept study with [18F]DPA714 PET
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12974-018-1352-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marloes H. J. Hagens, Sandeep V. Golla, Martijn T. Wijburg, Maqsood Yaqub, Dennis Heijtel, Martijn D. Steenwijk, Patrick Schober, John J. P. Brevé, Robert C. Schuit, Tristan A. Reekie, Michael Kassiou, Anne-Marie van Dam, Albert D. Windhorst, Joep Killestein, Frederik Barkhof, Bart N. M. van Berckel, Adriaan A. Lammertsma

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Other 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 18 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 22%
Chemistry 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 14 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#13,512,114
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#1,451
of 2,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,452
of 344,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#24
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,692 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.