You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Histology-guided high-resolution AP-SMALDI mass spectrometry imaging of wheat-Fusarium graminearum interaction at the root–shoot junction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-018-0368-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dhaka Ram Bhandari, Qing Wang, Bin Li, Wolfgang Friedt, Andreas Römpp, Bernhard Spengler, Sven Gottwald |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| India | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Mexico | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 22% |
| Researcher | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 20 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2018.
All research outputs
#6,954,635
of 25,155,561 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#418
of 1,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,379
of 450,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#11
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,155,561 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.