You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Surgical site infections after cesarean delivery: epidemiology, prevention and treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40748-017-0051-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tetsuya Kawakita, Helain J. Landy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 499 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 499 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 69 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 64 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 32 | 6% |
| Researcher | 30 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 68 | 14% |
| Unknown | 212 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 152 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 17 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 48 | 10% |
| Unknown | 221 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,376,006
of 23,347,114 outputs
Outputs from Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology
#21
of 85 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,911
of 314,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,347,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them