You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Can HIV service data be used for surveillance purposes?: a case study in Guangzhou, China
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-018-6128-8 |
Authors |
Weibin Cheng, Huifang Xu, Fei Zhong, Stephen Pan, Joseph D. Tucker, Sharon Weir, Jinkou Zhao, Weiming Tang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 18% |
Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Other | 9 | 18% |
Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 29% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
Psychology | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 17 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2018.
All research outputs
#5,835,643
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,827
of 15,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,123
of 437,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#139
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.