You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A deliberative dialogue as a knowledge translation strategy on road traffic injuries in Burkina Faso: a mixed-method evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-018-0388-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Esther Mc Sween-Cadieux, Christian Dagenais, Valéry Ridde |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 19% |
| France | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Senegal | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Scientists | 3 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 12 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 43 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,957,061
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#265
of 1,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,907
of 437,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#15
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.