You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The genome of the water strider Gerris buenoi reveals expansions of gene repertoires associated with adaptations to life on the water
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12864-018-5163-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Armisén, Rajendhran Rajakumar, Markus Friedrich, Joshua B. Benoit, Hugh M. Robertson, Kristen A. Panfilio, Seung-Joon Ahn, Monica F. Poelchau, Hsu Chao, Huyen Dinh, Harsha Vardhan Doddapaneni, Shannon Dugan, Richard A. Gibbs, Daniel S. T. Hughes, Yi Han, Sandra L. Lee, Shwetha C. Murali, Donna M. Muzny, Jiaxin Qu, Kim C. Worley, Monica Munoz-Torres, Ehab Abouheif, François Bonneton, Travis Chen, Li-Mei Chiang, Christopher P. Childers, Andrew G. Cridge, Antonin J. J. Crumière, Amelie Decaras, Elise M. Didion, Elizabeth J. Duncan, Elena N. Elpidina, Marie-Julie Favé, Cédric Finet, Chris G. C. Jacobs, Alys M. Cheatle Jarvela, Emily C. Jennings, Jeffery W. Jones, Maryna P. Lesoway, Mackenzie R. Lovegrove, Alexander Martynov, Brenda Oppert, Angelica Lillico-Ouachour, Arjuna Rajakumar, Peter Nagui Refki, Andrew J. Rosendale, Maria Emilia Santos, William Toubiana, Maurijn van der Zee, Iris M. Vargas Jentzsch, Aidamalia Vargas Lowman, Severine Viala, Stephen Richards, Abderrahman Khila |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
| Canada | 2 | 18% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 9% |
| France | 1 | 9% |
| Germany | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 5 | 45% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 24 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 30 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,280,610
of 23,435,471 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#666
of 10,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,687
of 439,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#16
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,435,471 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,771 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.