You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How do patients value and prioritize patient portal functionalities and usage factors? A conjoint analysis study with chronically ill patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-018-0708-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gaby Anne Wildenbos, Frank Horenberg, Monique Jaspers, Linda Peute, Danielle Sent |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 19% |
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 25 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2018.
All research outputs
#15,025,752
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1,247
of 2,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,614
of 437,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#24
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,013 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.