You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A prospective trial of elective extubation in brain injured patients meeting extubation criteria for ventilatory support: a feasibility study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, November 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc7112 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edward M Manno, Alejandro A Rabinstein, Eelco FM Wijdicks, Allen W Brown, William D Freeman, Vivien H Lee, Stephen D Weigand, Mark T Keegan, Daniel R Brown, Francis X Whalen, Tuhin K Roy, Rolf D Hubmayr |
| Abstract |
To assess the safety and feasibility of recruiting mechanically ventilated patients with brain injury who are solely intubated for airway protection and randomising them into early or delayed extubation, and to obtain estimates to refine sample-size calculations for a larger study. The design is a single-blinded block randomised controlled trial. A single large academic medical centre is the setting. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 141 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 39 | 27% |
| Unknown | 37 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 45 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2009.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,469
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,168
of 103,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#23
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.