↓ Skip to main content

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guideline for acute kidney injury 2016

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intensive Care, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guideline for acute kidney injury 2016
Published in
Journal of Intensive Care, August 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40560-018-0308-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kent Doi, Osamu Nishida, Takashi Shigematsu, Tomohito Sadahiro, Noritomo Itami, Kunitoshi Iseki, Yukio Yuzawa, Hirokazu Okada, Daisuke Koya, Hideyasu Kiyomoto, Yugo Shibagaki, Kenichi Matsuda, Akihiko Kato, Terumasa Hayashi, Tomonari Ogawa, Tatsuo Tsukamoto, Eisei Noiri, Shigeo Negi, Koichi Kamei, Hirotsugu Kitayama, Naoki Kashihara, Toshiki Moriyama, Yoshio Terada, The Japanese Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury 2016 Committee

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 23 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 23 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2018.
All research outputs
#20,542,814
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#480
of 517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,794
of 330,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#20
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.