You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-018-0586-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samantha Teague, George J. Youssef, Jacqui A. Macdonald, Emma Sciberras, Adrian Shatte, Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Chris Greenwood, Jennifer McIntosh, Craig A. Olsson, Delyse Hutchinson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 38% |
| Ireland | 2 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 62% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 363 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 363 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 55 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 67 | 18% |
| Unknown | 115 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 48 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 66 | 18% |
| Unknown | 142 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,439,817
of 25,399,318 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#352
of 2,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,568
of 445,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#19
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,399,318 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.