You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Periodic reflections: a method of guided discussions for documenting implementation phenomena
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-018-0610-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erin P. Finley, Alexis K. Huynh, Melissa M. Farmer, Bevanne Bean-Mayberry, Tannaz Moin, Sabine M. Oishi, Jessica L. Moreau, Karen E. Dyer, Holly Jordan Lanham, Luci Leykum, Alison B. Hamilton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 54% |
| Ireland | 3 | 23% |
| Belarus | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 54% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 172 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 15% |
| Researcher | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 17% |
| Unknown | 52 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 9% |
| Psychology | 15 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 16% |
| Unknown | 62 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,140,006
of 25,463,724 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#291
of 2,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,311
of 447,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#14
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,724 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.