↓ Skip to main content

Periodic reflections: a method of guided discussions for documenting implementation phenomena

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Periodic reflections: a method of guided discussions for documenting implementation phenomena
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12874-018-0610-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erin P. Finley, Alexis K. Huynh, Melissa M. Farmer, Bevanne Bean-Mayberry, Tannaz Moin, Sabine M. Oishi, Jessica L. Moreau, Karen E. Dyer, Holly Jordan Lanham, Luci Leykum, Alison B. Hamilton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 24 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 15%
Social Sciences 12 13%
Psychology 10 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 28 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,357,254
of 18,094,095 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#210
of 1,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,774
of 402,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#25
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,094,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.