↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: cuRnet: an R package for graph traversing on GPU

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction to: cuRnet: an R package for graph traversing on GPU
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12859-018-2484-8
Authors

Vincenzo Bonnici, Federico Busato, Stefano Aldegheri, Murodzhon Akhmedov, Luciano Cascione, Alberto Arribas Carmena, Francesco Bertoni, Nicola Bombieri, Ivo Kwee, Rosalba Giugno

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2018.
All research outputs
#11,064,660
of 13,941,062 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#4,324
of 5,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,566
of 367,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#332
of 411 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,941,062 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,198 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 411 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.