You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cellular ciliary phenotyping indicates pathogenicity of novel variants in IFT140 and confirms a Mainzer–Saldino syndrome diagnosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cilia, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13630-018-0055-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Machteld M. Oud, Brooke L. Latour, Zeineb Bakey, Stef J. Letteboer, Dorien Lugtenberg, Ka Man Wu, Elisabeth A. M. Cornelissen, Helger G. Yntema, Miriam Schmidts, Ronald Roepman, Ernie M. H. F. Bongers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,284,400
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Cilia
#34
of 91 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,835
of 330,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cilia
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them