You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Budgeting for a billion: applying health technology assessment (HTA) for universal health coverage in India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-018-0378-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Saudamini Vishwanath Dabak, Songyot Pilasant, Abha Mehndiratta, Laura Emily Downey, Francoise Cluzeau, Kalipso Chalkidou, Alia Cynthia Gonzales Luz, Sitaporn Youngkong, Yot Teerawattananon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
| Australia | 3 | 11% |
| India | 3 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Kenya | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 114 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 47 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 48 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,811,405
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#204
of 1,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,961
of 449,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#8
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.