↓ Skip to main content

The interaction of personal, contextual, and study characteristics and their effect on recruitment and participation of pregnant women in research: a qualitative study in Lebanon

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The interaction of personal, contextual, and study characteristics and their effect on recruitment and participation of pregnant women in research: a qualitative study in Lebanon
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12874-018-0616-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer J. Ayoub, May Abiad, Michele R. Forman, Gladys Honein-AbouHaidar, Farah Naja

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Master 10 11%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 30 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 11%
Psychology 8 9%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Unspecified 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 33 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2019.
All research outputs
#15,025,752
of 23,116,036 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,463
of 2,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,429
of 437,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#57
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,116,036 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.