↓ Skip to main content

Women with endometriosis improved their peripheral antioxidant markers after the application of a high antioxidant diet

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Women with endometriosis improved their peripheral antioxidant markers after the application of a high antioxidant diet
Published in
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, May 2009
DOI 10.1186/1477-7827-7-54
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Mier-Cabrera, Tania Aburto-Soto, Soraya Burrola-Méndez, Luis Jiménez-Zamudio, Mari C Tolentino, Esther Casanueva, César Hernández-Guerrero

Abstract

Oxidative stress has been identified in the peritoneal fluid and peripheral blood of women with endometriosis. However, there is little information on the antioxidant intake for this group of women. The objectives of this work were 1) to compare the antioxidant intake among women with and without endometriosis and 2) to design and apply a high antioxidant diet to evaluate its capacity to reduce oxidative stress markers and improve antioxidant markers in the peripheral blood of women with endometriosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 222 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 59 26%
Student > Master 28 12%
Researcher 17 7%
Student > Postgraduate 17 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 7%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 62 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 6%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 65 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,195,526
of 24,825,035 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#102
of 1,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,444
of 119,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,825,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.