↓ Skip to main content

Fostering the conduct of ethical and equitable research practices: the imperative for integrated knowledge translation in research conducted by and with indigenous community members

Overview of attention for article published in Research Involvement and Engagement, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fostering the conduct of ethical and equitable research practices: the imperative for integrated knowledge translation in research conducted by and with indigenous community members
Published in
Research Involvement and Engagement, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40900-018-0131-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janet Jull, Melody Morton-Ninomiya, Irene Compton, Annie Picard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 26 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 17 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Environmental Science 5 6%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 36 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,205,977
of 23,979,422 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#345
of 419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,237
of 443,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#16
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,979,422 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.