↓ Skip to main content

The interrater reliability of static palpation of the thoracic spine for eliciting tenderness and stiffness to test for a manipulable lesion

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The interrater reliability of static palpation of the thoracic spine for eliciting tenderness and stiffness to test for a manipulable lesion
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12998-018-0218-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amber M. Beynon, Jeffrey J. Hebert, Bruce F. Walker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 25%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 9 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,877,712
of 15,653,432 outputs
Outputs from Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
#203
of 423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,591
of 387,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
#38
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,653,432 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.