↓ Skip to main content

“Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis” in Ixodes ricinus ticks collected near the Arctic Circle in Norway

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis” in Ixodes ricinus ticks collected near the Arctic Circle in Norway
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13071-018-3168-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clarinda Larsson, Dag Hvidsten, Snorre Stuen, Anna J. Henningsson, Peter Wilhelmsson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 10 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2018.
All research outputs
#13,115,587
of 23,116,036 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#2,220
of 5,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,531
of 437,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#66
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,116,036 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.