You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A multicenter, randomized controlled comparison of three renutrition strategies for the management of moderate acute malnutrition among children aged from 6 to 24 months (the MALINEA project)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-018-3027-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Muriel Vray, Boris G. Hedible, Pierrick Adam, Laura Tondeur, Alexandre Manirazika, Rindra Randremanana, Halima Mainassara, André Briend, Cecile Artaud, Cassandre von Platen, Mathias Altmann, Ronan Jambou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 145 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 70 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 75 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2018.
All research outputs
#4,142,410
of 23,116,036 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,590
of 5,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,672
of 437,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#65
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,116,036 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.