You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Economic evaluation of the NET intervention versus guideline dissemination for management of mild head injury in hospital emergency departments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-018-0834-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Duncan Mortimer, Marije Bosch, Joanne E. Mckenzie, Simon Turner, Marisa Chau, Jennie L. Ponsford, Jonathan C. Knott, Russell L. Gruen, Sally E. Green |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Australia | 2 | 25% |
| Colombia | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 52 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 11% |
| Psychology | 11 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 57 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,136,559
of 23,306,612 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,179
of 1,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,848
of 438,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#26
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,306,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.