↓ Skip to main content

Professional learning and development of postdoctoral scholars: a scoping review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Professional learning and development of postdoctoral scholars: a scoping review protocol
Published in
Systematic Reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13643-018-0892-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorelli Nowell, K. Alix Hayden, Carol Berenson, Natasha Kenny, Nancy Chick, Carolyn Emery

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Other 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Psychology 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 4 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,358,770
of 20,091,699 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#451
of 1,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,301
of 414,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#67
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,091,699 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.