↓ Skip to main content

Significance of molecular classification of ependymomas: C11orf95-RELA fusion-negative supratentorial ependymomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica Communications, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Significance of molecular classification of ependymomas: C11orf95-RELA fusion-negative supratentorial ependymomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica Communications, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40478-018-0630-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kohei Fukuoka, Yonehiro Kanemura, Tomoko Shofuda, Shintaro Fukushima, Satoshi Yamashita, Daichi Narushima, Mamoru Kato, Mai Honda-Kitahara, Hitoshi Ichikawa, Takashi Kohno, Atsushi Sasaki, Junko Hirato, Takanori Hirose, Takashi Komori, Kaishi Satomi, Akihiko Yoshida, Kai Yamasaki, Yoshiko Nakano, Ai Takada, Taishi Nakamura, Hirokazu Takami, Yuko Matsushita, Tomonari Suzuki, Hideo Nakamura, Keishi Makino, Yukihiko Sonoda, Ryuta Saito, Teiji Tominaga, Yasuhiro Matsusaka, Keiichi Kobayashi, Motoo Nagane, Takuya Furuta, Mitsutoshi Nakada, Yoshitaka Narita, Yuichi Hirose, Shigeo Ohba, Akira Wada, Katsuyoshi Shimizu, Kazuhiko Kurozumi, Isao Date, Junya Fukai, Yousuke Miyairi, Naoki Kagawa, Atsufumi Kawamura, Makiko Yoshida, Namiko Nishida, Takafumi Wataya, Masayoshi Yamaoka, Naohiro Tsuyuguchi, Takehiro Uda, Mayu Takahashi, Yoshiteru Nakano, Takuya Akai, Shuichi Izumoto, Masahiro Nonaka, Kazuhisa Yoshifuji, Yoshinori Kodama, Masayuki Mano, Tatsuya Ozawa, Vijay Ramaswamy, Michael D. Taylor, Toshikazu Ushijima, Soichiro Shibui, Mami Yamasaki, Hajime Arai, Hiroaki Sakamoto, Ryo Nishikawa, Koichi Ichimura

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 14%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Other 7 8%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 24 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 14%
Neuroscience 10 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 30 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,621,042
of 25,502,817 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#745
of 1,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,597
of 446,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#17
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,502,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.