↓ Skip to main content

Regional working in the East of England: using the UK National Standards for Public Involvement

Overview of attention for article published in Research Involvement and Engagement, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
37 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regional working in the East of England: using the UK National Standards for Public Involvement
Published in
Research Involvement and Engagement, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40900-018-0130-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elspeth Mathie, Helena Wythe, Diane Munday, Graham Rhodes, Penny Vicary, Paul Millac, Julia Jones

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 26%
Student > Bachelor 4 21%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Student > Postgraduate 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 7 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,571,771
of 25,386,051 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#128
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,015
of 450,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,386,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.