You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A review protocol on research partnerships: a Coordinated Multicenter Team approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-018-0879-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Femke Hoekstra, Kelly J. Mrklas, Kathryn M. Sibley, Tram Nguyen, Mathew Vis-Dunbar, Christine J. Neilson, Leah K. Crockett, Heather L. Gainforth, Ian D. Graham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 8 | 73% |
| France | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 17 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 6% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 19% |
| Unknown | 25 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,586,269
of 24,329,306 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#689
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,738
of 445,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#34
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,329,306 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.