↓ Skip to main content

Defining and conceptualising data harmonisation: a scoping review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Defining and conceptualising data harmonisation: a scoping review protocol
Published in
Systematic Reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13643-018-0890-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bey-Marrié Schmidt, Christopher J. Colvin, Ameer Hohlfeld, Natalie Leon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 20 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Computer Science 5 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 22 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,836,371
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#996
of 2,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,964
of 437,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#56
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.