You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Rapid overview of systematic reviews of nocebo effects reported by patients taking placebos in clinical trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trials, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13063-018-3042-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jeremy Howick, Rebecca Webster, Nigel Kirby, Kerry Hood |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 140 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 26 | 19% |
United States | 13 | 9% |
Japan | 11 | 8% |
Canada | 7 | 5% |
Curaçao | 1 | <1% |
Comoros | 1 | <1% |
Antarctica | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Other | 11 | 8% |
Unknown | 67 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 111 | 79% |
Scientists | 19 | 14% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 20% |
Unknown | 21 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 27% |
Psychology | 8 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Unknown | 20 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 336. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#94,608
of 24,827,122 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#10
of 6,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,878
of 447,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#2
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,827,122 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,351 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.