↓ Skip to main content

Cross-reactive dengue virus-derived monoclonal antibodies to Zika virus envelope protein: Panacea or Pandora’s box?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cross-reactive dengue virus-derived monoclonal antibodies to Zika virus envelope protein: Panacea or Pandora’s box?
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12879-018-3572-0
Authors

Shannon A. Gunawardana, Robert H. Shaw

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 24 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 30 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2018.
All research outputs
#12,405,698
of 14,021,395 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,444
of 5,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#313,528
of 368,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#441
of 590 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,021,395 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,228 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 590 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.