You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of index hopping and bias towards the reference allele on accuracy of genotype calls from low-coverage sequencing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetics Selection Evolution, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12711-018-0436-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roger Ros-Freixedes, Mara Battagin, Martin Johnsson, Gregor Gorjanc, Alan J. Mileham, Steve D. Rounsley, John M. Hickey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 21% |
| United States | 4 | 12% |
| Sweden | 3 | 9% |
| Norway | 2 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 17 | 52% |
| Members of the public | 16 | 48% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 19 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,800,760
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Genetics Selection Evolution
#18
of 821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,360
of 444,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics Selection Evolution
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 821 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.