↓ Skip to main content

Impact of index hopping and bias towards the reference allele on accuracy of genotype calls from low-coverage sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics Selection Evolution, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 731)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
33 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of index hopping and bias towards the reference allele on accuracy of genotype calls from low-coverage sequencing
Published in
Genetics Selection Evolution, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12711-018-0436-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roger Ros-Freixedes, Mara Battagin, Martin Johnsson, Gregor Gorjanc, Alan J. Mileham, Steve D. Rounsley, John M. Hickey

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 4 7%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 24%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,512,490
of 22,503,967 outputs
Outputs from Genetics Selection Evolution
#18
of 731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,239
of 428,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics Selection Evolution
#4
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,503,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 731 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.