You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A simple method for determining dosimetric leaf gap with cross-field dose width for rounded leaf-end multileaf collimator systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiation Oncology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13014-018-1164-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chih-Yuan Lin, An-Cheng Shiau, Jin-Huei Ji, Chia-Jung Lee, Ti-Hao Wang, Shu-Hui Hsu, Ji-An Liang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 24% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 12 | 24% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 21 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#420
of 2,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,724
of 342,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#12
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,053 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.